Radiant pressure and gravity. 

    In General Relativity “space – time” is curved by presence of masses ; so it’s been definitively abandoned the vision of gravity as a force generated by a mass, as for the common thinking is.

    From elsewhere it’s been “created” the  “dark matter” to giustificate observations showing galaxies with relative speed growing  (cosmologic “red shift”).

    But why the attribute “dark” ? Cos this “substance” cannot be observed if not by the effects that it produces. But also an electromagnetic radiation with highest frequency couldn’t show itself to the ordinary instruments of measure. And then, why dislocate this matter (with her property to do a job called “dark energy”) where its much useful to explain unusual gravitational effects, when it would be much more logic to think it uniformely distributed in all the universe, being probably these unknown effects visible also by an hypotetic observer standing in our Hubble’s horizon ?

I think that the “dark” space could be a “continuous” and “not quantized” one that, in symmetric conditions, it’s perfectly balanced, being setted up from spheric waves of matter (mass – energy), probably in opposition of phases, oscillating with order of size of length of the waves, as Planck’s sizes (1,61624 x 10^-35 mt.) and so highest energy. These waves, in supersymmetric conditions and highest frequency, (over gamma rays) could be almost destroyed when are in opposition of phase, with compensations of Poynting’s vectors and nearly all potential energy. But when a mass breaks this supersymmetry of “vacuum”, some weaves could enter in resonance and get out kinetic energy causing a “radiant pressure” on a surface. This phenomenon could exists in Planck’s time and length, so instrumentally not visible if not when length of waves is nearly to the gamma rays one. Not sub atomic particles, but only one kind of matter oscillating with different frequencies, and only one force.

A space occupied by a mass would be less charged by this energy than the surrounding one and so, ad example, a spheric mass would be a compress one.

Gravity would be a compressive force and movement of galaxies, stars and planets, as sub atomic particles, would be the result of not compensated Poynting’s vectors in a kind of  “hydrodynamic” space.

    In this kind of space every object “floats or proceeds of rectilinear uniform movement, since an external cause disrupts this state”, because the Poynting’s vectors are balanced on it for the biggest symmetry of the impulses of motion (linear and angular ones). The “external cause” could be, for example, a second object that moves a volume of  balancing space (in analogy with Archimede’s law). A single object, with equatorial diameter bigger than, about, 200 Km, assumes, not for the chance, a spheric configuration, cos the sphere is the geometric volume better balanced by external forces (as a sphere submerged in the water)….Probably, in the origin, it was a disorganized quantity of matter that surrounding universe has conformed to the spheric configuration, like a press.

    At this point, gravitational attraction can be interpretated not as a property of the objects, but as an action of  the surrounding space, caused by the part of it no more balanced by the moved volume.

    In analogy with mechanical sciences, when the polygon of Poynting’s vectors is not closed, the two objiects are pusched one towards the other and not collide only if they have sufficient motion quantity to balance the thrust of surrounding space.

    The orbital motion is the consequence of the rebalancing of the system and, the same rotation of heavenly bodies around their axis, could be the effect of the electronic “spin” that is the quantistic translation of angular motion  of surrounding space, as a kinematic motion of “rolling without crawling”.

    In the field of strong subatomic interactions, then, in a space with a differential distribution of “spin” and electric charge, stability could be obtained with an integration “loop” in a demain with sizes of the order of Planck’s length, imposing as “surrounding conditions” the uniform distribution of energy (or, that it’s the same, the balance of Poynting’s vectors).

    I propose a simple and much approximated gravitational model to better explain these concepts.

    To simplify I’ve got Earth – Moon system, with Earth’s centre as origin of cartesian reference and Moon’s orbit almost circular around it.

    Dates avalaible are the following ones :

• R_T : Earth’s equatorial ray = 6.400 Km = 6.400.000 mt. ;
• M_T : Earth’s mass = 5,976 x 10²⁴ Kg ;
• R_L : Moon’s equatorial ray = 1.735 km = 1.735.000 mt ;
• M_L : Moon’s mass = 7,357 x 10²² Kg ;
• G : universal gravitational costant = 6,67259 x 10^-11 ;
• R_Lim. : “Roche’s limit ray”, that is minimum orbital ray that Moon could have had without being destroyed by earthly gravity = 2,86 x R_T = 18.304 Km = 18.304.000 mt ;
• R_m. : actual medium Moon’s orbital ray = 380.000 Km = 380.000.000 mt ;
• S_P : “Planck’s space” = 1,616 x 10^-35 mt.

Supposing that medium Moon’s orbital ray could be passed from R_Lim. to R_m., I calculate the relative volume of the “bull” of space, with the formula :  V = 2 π² R r², in which “r” is the ray of the “tube” and “R” is the distance of the centre of the tube from the one of the bull. Substituting r with Moon’s equatorial ray, R_L and R with difference between rays of the orbites (R_m - R_Lim.), I obtain : DV (m³) = 2,149 x 10²², that is the variation of volume of space occupied by Moon in the progressive sending away from Earth.

In the same way the variation of lateral surface of the bull is DA = 4 π^2 r (Rm - RLim.) = 2,48 x 10^16 m^2.

In first approximation I take that the number of Planck’s spaces, contained in DV equal to : np = (DV/DA) / SP = 5,36 x 10^40.

“Radiant energy” associated to these spaces can be calculated with the formula E = np x h x vi = nearly 10^31 Joule, being h = 6,626 x 10^-34 Joule sec Planck’s costant and ni = 3 x 10 ^23 Hz max frequency founded for gamma radiation of bottom.

The relative variation of potential gravitational energy can be expressed with the formula : DU = G x M_T x M_L x (1/ R_Lim. – 1/ R_m.) = 1,52 x 10³⁰ Joule.

Results an error of a factor 10.

Earth, Moon and other heavenly bodies would be, at least, compress spheres.

In this kind of space also photon has its own mass (better inertia) as a recent Chinese experiment with torsion balance has shown. Infact if we think that under Planck’s scale there are not subatomic particles, but a continuous “plasma” of matter we can assume that in Planck’s length (10^-35 m), being quiet mass of proton approximately equal to 10^-27 Kg, and linear dimension of it approximately 10^-15 m, can be contained 10^-35/10^-15 x 10^-27 Kg = 10 ^-47 Kg of matter.

Then, let suppose that in 10^-44 sec (Planck’s time) photon can be accelerated from 0 to 300.000.000 m/sec with medium acceleration equal to c/10^-44 = 10^52 m/sec^2.

So the “job” done over the photon in Planck’s length is : 10^-47 x 10^52 x 10^-35 = 10^-30 Joule = 1,87 x 10^-11 ev, equal to kinetic energy of photon : mc^2 = 10^-47 x c^2 with mass of the photon equal to the mass calculated before : 10^-50 g. 
 

la fonte e stata inviata e ricevuta da enrico valboensi a Stefano Gusman