antigravita e non solo sono raccolti in un  insieme di link che compaiono su antigravity.it aggiornamento del 2005

1) DEFINISCI LA TUA MISSIONE, LA TUA VISIONE E I TUOI VALORI
Ebbene si, siamo di nuovo pronti ad affrontare un nuovo anno.
Questo è il classico momento di riflessione sulle nostre priorità dei
prossimi 12 mesi, il momento della definizione (o ri-definizione) e
pianificazione dei nostri obiettivi.
Prima di concentrarvi sui risultati che volete ottenere quest'anno e come
lavoro di preparazione ai vostri prossimi obiettivi, lasciate che vi
chieda: avete una missione e una visione? Non intendo per missione e
visione dell'azienda per la quale lavorate, ma intendo per voi stessi.
Avete mai investito del tempo per pensare alla vostra carriera, alla
vostra vita personale, determinare il vostro scopo di vita e scegliere il
percorso da fare?

Molte persone hanno chiaro in mente la loro missione e la loro visione,
perché questo li aiuta a scegliere quelle opportunità da perseguire e non
devono perdere tempo con attività che non sono allineate ai loro
obiettivi.

Probabilmente avete sentito il detto "Se non sai dove stai andando,
qualsiasi strada è quella giusta". Troppe persone sono su un percorso
insoddisfacente di carriera sperando che prima o poi lungo la strada
incapperanno nel lavoro "giusto". Sfortunatamente, queste sono le stesse
persone che iniziano a provare panico attorno ai loro quarant'anni perché
non hanno ancora identificato cosa vogliono fare da grandi.

Le aziende hanno scoperto le positive opportunità di una missione
focalizzata e una visione. Molte di loro stanno includendo anche una
definizione dei loro valori chiave. Questo perché hanno capito che c'è una
ragione chiave per tracciare una rotta: possono così aumentare le
possibilità di raggiungere i loro obiettivi.

Forse alcuni collaboratori esterni o lavoratori in proprio ci hanno fatto
qualche pensierino, già. D'altra parte chi non ha un lavoro stabile e
sicuro deve sicuramente porre attenzione alla direzione da prendere. Ma
chi è che ancora pensa di avere un lavoro sicuro? Io credo nessuno.

Ho iniziato a pensare alla mia missione e visione quando alcuni anni fa ho
iniziato a lavorare come coach e ad aiutare alcune aziende (ma a volte
anche singoli individui) a sviluppare la loro missione e visione. E mi
sono sentita poco coerente nel voler dare supporto ad altri nelle aree di
missione e visione quando ancora non avevo sviluppato le mie. Da allora la
mia missione e visione mi aiutano a scegliere quali opzioni sono quelle
più giuste e allineate con l'individuo che sono, quelle che sono da
eliminare e a fare progressi molto rapidamente.

Come procedere?
Prenditi una o due ore di tempo focalizzato durante il quale non sarai
disturbato. Scegli un posto tranquillo, silenzioso e che ti dia
ispirazione. Stacca telefoni, cellulari e pc. Se serve metti un piccolo
cartello fuori della porta che avvisa che non devi essere disturbato.

Missione
La missione rappresenta la ragione per la quale siamo al mondo, quello
scopo supremo che siamo sulla terra per raggiungere. La missione è
qualcosa di grande, importante, ispiratore ed è molto spesso è legata ai
valori che riteniamo importanti nella nostra vita.

Per sviluppare la tua missione, guarda oltre le cose più ovvie, come
stipendio e benefit e chiediti: "Perché lavoro?", "Sono a servizio di
quale grande scopo?". Questo ti aiuterà a definire la tua missione. Pensa
in grande. Un esempio è "Per raggiungere la soddisfazione di aiutare dei
giovani ragazzi a sviluppare equilibrio e solidità".

alla fine del test ....

COME E' ANDATA?
Mi piacerebbe sapere se hai seguito i suggerimenti di questa newsletter e
come è andata. Inviami la tua storia e le tue riflessioni a
rami@antigravity.it grazie ..

ecco la mia ..


Missione
La  missione di Rami  rappresenta la ragione per la quale è al mondo :

Elevare l'animo delle persone sia a livello fisico che spirituale ...una unione di componeti materili e immateriali
La mia visione
__cercare di produrre solo pensieri che possono elevare la gente pensieri sublimi non bassi .come desideri  cercare di fare un esercizio comune  con le persone all coscienza della visione positiva.

cercare di cambiare me e chi sta con me cercando di fare entrare me in un vortice autogenerato da me e dai contatti che ricevo cercando di riconoscere i nostri limiti valutando ciò che può essere fatto e ciò che non pò essere fatto  ed avere l energia sufficiente e la costanza per compiere ciò che può essere compiuto, accettare quello che non pò essere cambiato ...sorridere e poi il segreto del tutto per rendere la nostra vita magica ....si chi sta vicino a me avra  piu' elementi tra cui l' umorismo .. quando ridiamo abbiamo 7 anni ...qunado piangiamo ne abbiamo 70 ...ritroviamo il bambino che ce in noi...solo cosi potremo elevare la nostra mente e il nostro corpo ..solo cosi potremmo essere il preludio per la levitazione..

 

se cerchiamo  di pensare lal luce . alle correlazioni eccelze dle cuore alla globalità verso l' infinito e verso
Visione
Lo scopo del nostro lavoro e non lavorare con le mani ne con la mente .. ma con il cuore la parte più assopita delle vostre facoltà , la visione iniziale e la viosione finale o meglio l'attrattore fornisce le direzione verso le nostre  destinazioni iniziali e finali. L' inizio e stato a San franscico USA in un centro di esplorazione sapziale chiamto neoetic center ..in Santa Rosa l 'attrattore e portare un inseime di persone oggetti .. modi di essere insieme a  me o senza di me nella finestra temporale spaziale  di  elevazione  data dalla frequenza planetaria che risuonerà sui  13 herz .. e oltre .. ho sognato fiono da bambino piccolo di cavalcare le onde dell oceoano della gravità ....I miei talenti sono essere sensibile agli ideli più elevati dell umanità quali :misticismo scientifico superelttrone antigravitazione energia di punto zero fisica metattonica il tempo non esiste come invarianza le cellule energizzate autocoscientiil tempo in funzione del °tanto° di energia ?

altre abilita che ho sono curare con le mani legge aura interpretare i pensieri degli altri ..

voglio essere l' obelisco che fa da riferimento ascenzione di ogni persona spirituale e di ogni uomo di scienza libera che voglia vedere più in là...


Cose o attività che davvero amo fare:

fare l' amore con l'universo sentire le energie dentro la mia spina dorsale pensare al bene essere sempre in azione per aiutare me e gli altri.


Cosa mi procura felicità/gioia:

ogni giorno vedere il sole dentro di me e nella natura il cileo un uccelino ch canta le piccole cose della vita .


I miei migliori 2 momenti della scorsa settimana:

il fuoco di un camino e il salto del mio cane con leccata e capriola e poi tutti i sorrisi ricevuti ...

Tre cose che farei se vincessi alla lotteria:

costruirei con i soldi della lotteria  un sistema alternativo di distribuzione della ricchezza ...in modo che nessuno possa avere invidia dell altro .. poichè è felice di ciò che ha..

Questioni o cause che mi stanno particolarmente a cuore:

lunità della umnaita e la sua elevazione la possibilità di rendere operativa la griglia planetaria liberare dalla griglia biologica liberarsi dalle influenze  degli altri ...


I miei valori più importanti (cerca tre o quattro): essere cosciente di essere felice solo se capisco la sua dinamicità  essere artistico e armonico con me  e con gli  altri
Raggiungere (ottenere risultati, completare dei compiti); Avanzamento
(progredire, crescere); Avventura (esperienze nuove e sfidanti,
eccitazione); Espressione artistica (teatro, pittura, letteratura);
Equilibrio (dare l'opportuna attenzione a ogni area); Competizione
(vincere, assumersi rischi); Contribuire (fare la differenza, dare);
Controllo (essere a capo di qualcosa); Cooperazione (lavoro di squadra,
lavorare bene con gli altri); Creatività (essere espressivo, innovativo,
sperimentare); Sicurezza economica (libertà da preoccupazioni
finanziarie); Correttezza (dare ad ognuno la stessa possibilità); Fama
(essere molto conosciuto); Felicità familiare (andare d'accordo,
rispettare i familiari); Amicizia (intimità, forte amicizia  se stessi  e con gli
altri
); Generosità (dare prontamente); Salute (essere in forma,
energetici, liberi da malattie); Indipendenza (libertà dal controllo di
altri, contare su di sé); Influenza (condizionare idée, persone,
processi); Armonia interiore (essere in pace con se stesso e in armonia con gli altri ); Integrità
(onestà. Sincerità, vivere i propri valori); Apprendimento (impegno a
comprendere); Natura (rinnovamento interiore nella natura); Ordine
(organizzazione, conformità, stabilità)

Cose che posso fare ad un livello da buono ad eccellente:

sorridere la mattina appena mi alzo e benedire tutto quello che mi succede amare gli altri con parole e azioni  e ridere .. giocare come i bambini  progettare e avere idee immagini di mondi e ricevere informazini  dall akascia su come costruire  navicelle spaziali e sistemi non ancora scoperti  raccontare favole la sera ai miei amici e amiche essere un uomo che ha un buon cuore .. e che lo fa sentire agli altri

posso essere più vitale poso fare godere la vita alle persone che mi sono accanto poiche gli posso dare unica cosa che non si può commercializzare se e pura  l' amore .. verso se stessi con la delicatezza di una rosa ..con la penetrazione di un uragano  fare sentire il mio abbarccio e la carezza di un padre nel capo di un bambino ..sopratutto mi so fermare quando sono debole ...e so continuare quando sono forte ...


Cosa vorrei smettere di fare o fare il meno possibile:

vorrei smettre di vedere la fame .. di amore introno a me ...e non poter fare nulla ....per soddisfarla ...non avere tempo per soddisfare tutte le richiste di amore e di solidarietà


Prendete le risposte e provare ora ad immaginare come arriverete alla
vostra destinazione finale.

la destinazione

La mia visione
 e cercare di essere piu responsabile delel azioni che faccio per arrivare ogni giorno alal ogni istante alal consapevolezza di ...fare un qualcosa di appetitoso della vita riscoprire un buon cibo o un buon ristorante ... per rivivere la vita ...

   La Terra non è malata: è incinta!

Due anni fa avevo proposto un documento al congresso annuale della
International Astronautic Federation, il cui titolo era: "Lady Earth, would
you like to have a baby?"
(http://www.tdf.it/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcforumid13/13.html). Il documento
sviluppava proprio questo concetto: la nascita di una Baby Civiltà Solare,
data alla luce dalla nostra Madre Terra, ingravidata dal progresso
tecnologico e culturale della specie umana. Nel paper, ed in un mio libro
ancora non pubblicato, si discute il ruolo della pressione, nel processo
della gravidanza. La pressione cresce, ed è un processo pericoloso, che può
portare ad un aborto disastroso, ed alla morte del bimbo e/o della madre.
Però la pressione è utile, ed inevitabile, se si vuole che alla gravidanza
segua un lieto evento. David Buth introduce alcune considerazioni di grande
rilevanza, a proposito della coscienza della gravidanza, e della necessità
di assistenza.

Osservazioni simili possiamo ritrovarle in un mio articolo del 2003 "Why not
to hope (and work) for a miracle??"
(http://www.tdf.it/cgi-bin/dcforum/DCForumID2/369.html): La Signora Civiltà
Terrestre è incinta, e partorirà una piccola Civiltà Solare, ma nessuno si
prende cura di questa gravidanza, così rischiamo l'aborto e lo shutdown del
processo. Come in una gravidanza (o in una caldaia) la pressione sta
crescendo (il numero di individui in un sistema chiuso). Se continuiamo a
non riconoscere questo processo critico, e non cominciamo ad assisterlo ed a
controllarlo (aprendo almeno una valvola, per cominciare a modularlo), la
caldaia esploderà o (in caso contrario) avremo lo shutdown della pressione,
con l'aborto del processo. Oggi potremmo anche dire che tale valvola esiste,
ed è comparsa nel 2004, anno per tanti versi disastroso, che però ha visto
anche qualche evento di enorme portata positiva. Si chiama SpaceShipOne, ed
ha aperto la speranza di un accesso allo spazio a basso costo, finalmente
accessibile ai privati imprenditori di buona volontà!

David Buth paragona la biosfera gravida all'ipotesi di Gaia, proposta dal
Dr. Lovelock. Devo confessare che l'ipotesi di Gaia non mi ha mai attratto
granchè, sinora, poiché utilizzata principalmente dal pensiero nichilista.
Ovviamente nulla vieta di prendere da una teoria quanto di concettualmente
positivo essa contiene. Poiché nelle nostre strategie politiche globalizzate
la colonizzazione spaziale (assurdamente) è ancora considerata poco meno di
un'opzione fra tante - un argomento di speculazione per studiosi un po'
fanatici - la nostra biosfera si trova esattamente nelle condizioni di una
donna gravida che non sa della propria gravidanza, e neppure che esistono i
bambini.

Dice Buth: una donna incinta sperimenta una crescita insostenibile nel suo
addome, nei propri organi riproduttivi. Immaginate quanto sarebbe
terrificante questo processo, se Lei non conoscesse la gravidanza.
Similmente, la Terra sta esperimentando una crescita insostenibile della
popolazione umana - quella che, nella nostra metafora, è il sistema
riproduttivo della Madre Terra. Una donna incinta subisce mutamenti nella
chimica del suo corpo. Similmente, la biosfera sta subendo mutamenti
climatici e chimici, dell'aria e dell'acqua, a causa dell'inquinamento
indotto dalle attività umane.

La gravidanza e la nascita, prima dell'avvento della medicina moderna,
potevano essere processi molto pericolosi per la donna. La morte della madre
o del bambino erano una volta piuttosto comuni. Similmente, le arme
nucleari, l'inquinamento, e gli altri problemi minacciano la civiltà (benchè
la biosfera sia sopravvissuta a condizioni molto peggiori). Una signora
coscienziosa tratta il proprio corpo con maggior cura durante la
gravidanza - mangiando bene, dormendo molto, evitando fumo ed alcool, e si
sottopone ad un appropriato monitoraggio medico. Le implicazioni per la
Signora Terra sono ovvie, visto che non esistono dottori o ostetriche
esperte!

Nella metafora della Madre Terra, il compito dell'umanità è ovvio. Noi siamo
qui per aiutare la Madre Terra a partorire. Noi siamo l'apparato
riproduttivo, e parte di noi è il feto che sta crescendo. I dinosauri
fallirono, dopo un lungo periodo di successo, perché una cometa o un
asteroide, sembra, colpirono la Terra e li spazzarono via. In seguito si è
evoluta una specie capace di volare nello spazio - e che è in grado di
evitare lo stesso destino, espandendosi fuori della Terra. L'espansione
dell'ambiente vitale di una specie è una strategia di sopravvivenza
piuttosto frequente e ben riuscita. L'espansione nel sistema solare ed, in
seguito, nella galassia, dovrebbe assicurare alla nostra specie un capitale
di sopravvivenza sostanziale ed immenso.

Ho voluto mettere i miei argomenti insieme a quelli proposti da David Buth,
non per una sciocca vanteria, ma per sottolinearne la complementarietà, e
soprattutto perché mi sembra straordinario che sia venuta in mente la stessa
metafora a due persone che vivono a migliaia di chilometri di distanza, e
che non sono mai venuti in contatto prima! Voglio interpretarlo come una
specie di segno del destino (la nostra storia ha visto altri miracoli, e si
può dire che la nostra specie sia giunta fin qui per miracolo, quindi perché
non dare valore anche a segni inequivocabilmente positivi?), o comunque come
testimonianza del grande valore di questa metafora, rivolta al futuro ed
alla speranza di sopravvivenza, per la nostra specie e la nostra Civiltà!
Accanto al cordoglio per le vittime, insieme al nostro fare il possibile per
aiutare le popolazioni colpite dalla rottura della faglia vicino a Sumatra,
forse questo pensiero può aiutarci a scegliere una strategia attiva, di
prevenzione, di assistenza, di accelerazione nello sviluppo della Space
Economy.

Si profila una nostra nascita, in molti sensi: una baby Società Solare, una
civiltà più etica, una società capace di usare molto meglio le capacità ed i
talenti di tutti i Terrestri:

        Alla Madre Terra sono iniziate le contrazioni, e si avvicinano le
doglie del parto, trattiamola bene, ed aiutiamola a partorire!

Penso che siamo in grave ritardo. Dovremmo già avere almeno 20 anni di
esperienza di vita e lavoro sulla Luna. Dovremmo essere molto più avanti,
nella soluzione dei problemi principali del sostegno alla vita umana fuori
della Terra: la gravità artificiale, per contrastare il decadimento osseo e
muscolare; la difesa contro le radiazioni cosmiche; la generazione di
ossigeno ed acqua; la coltivazione ed allevamento di cibo in ambienti
completamente artificiali. Questo ritardo diventa sempre più grave: pensate
se la Mamma ci spingesse fuori dal suo utero prima che noi si sia
minimamente pronti a sopravvivere! È quindi estremamente urgente e di
importanza vitale che questa visione di gravidanza e nascita si diffonda il
più ampiamente possibile fra tutti i Terrestri di buona volontà: ognuno di
noi può fare qualcosa.

Oggi, più che mai:

Guardate in alto!


dary may have had 1/5 of this number of turns. The original purpose for these units was unknown, but the units were marked as 5.0 mH and a 5:1 ratio. Since the possible output was expected to be low-level, the load in the output was made an LED device rated at 10 ma at 1.85 volts DC. The test circuit was thus as follows:

Figure 1: MRA-Type Circuit

Before I give some test results, lets briefly review some basics of series resonant circuits. The current 'flow' in a capacitor leads the voltage by 90° in phase, while the current 'flow' in an inductor lags the voltage by 90° in phase. Thus in a series resonant circuit the voltages across the C and L are 180° out of phase but the currents are equal and remain in phase. At resonance, the inductive reactance and the capacitive reactance are equal and thus cancel out, leaving the current to be determined by the driving source and the resistance which remains. However, above resonance the capacitive reactance decreases and the inductive reactance increases, while the opposite conditions prevail below resonance. At resonance, the voltages across the elements are greater than the source voltage and depend upon the element Q's. Moreover, when energy is being 'stored' in the inductor's H-field, energy is being returned to the circuit from the capacitor's E-field, and vice versa. The power available is 'lossless' power or a purely reactive power in ideal reactances, but practical reactances always have some loss mechanisms, primarily of a resistive nature. Under such conditions we should use the term impedance rather than reactance. The reactive power of an inductor can be 'impedance matched' to useful real load power by the use of transformer action. At the high frequencies, the cores of these transformers are generally made of ferrite-type materials for reduced 'eddy current' losses and also good response to the high frequency changes.

III. Optimization of MRA-Type Circuits ~

To maintain a high reactive power, the reactance of the circuit element must be high compared to any resistive or other loss mechanisms. This will be expressed in the quality factor, or Q, of that element. Thus, high Q is most desirable in series resonant circuits. This will result in 'sharp' resonant frequencies and 'high' circulating currents at resonance. Since reactive power is equal to i2X, high Q generally will also mean high reactive powers. Also, the voltage across either the inductor or capacitor will be equal to QVg where Vg is the voltage of the source generator. Thus, the voltage across the reactances can be many times the source voltage at resonant conditions.

So far, we have considered normally accepted reactance and transformer theory. In this particular test, the following additional observations may also be made. During resonance, the capacitor and the inductor are continually being 'charged' and 'discharged' at the rate of the resonant frequency, which in the case of Figure (1) was in the order off 90 KHz. Now in terms of my Rhysmonic theory, the particular reactive elements used there can also 'interact' with space energy during these cycles. It is believed that the prime source of space energy in this case may be that of the earth's gravity field, although there are probably many other sources out there in space. I have used capacitors and inductors as 'detection' elements in many of my GW (Gravity Wave) detectors and gravimeters and have made much of the early data on these aspects available to interested researchers.

To emphasize these interactions with space energy, e.g., the earth's g-field, the capacitors and inductors should be fairly large size and of high Q. The choice for the capacitor probably should be planar type piezo elements, and the various coil construction probably should contain ferrite-type cores. My past experience has been that capacitors are effective in GW detectors where high circuit gains make the small signals which appear in such capacitors useful, but cols may be more effective in terms of power extraction from the latent space energy (Ref. 2). For this very reason it was observed that the circuit of Figure (1) had higher power gains (more efficiency) when the circuit was operated somewhat above resonance, or about 100 KHz! Here, XC was reduced and XL was increased. Also, the real current being drawn from the source drops sharply. Thus, the real power being drawn from the driving source is greatly reduced, but the reactive power in coil L1 is increased more than what had been obtained there at peak resonance. That reactive power present in coil L1 can then be 'impedance matched' efficiently to a resistive load, e.g., the LED, across the secondary coil, L2, by the use of transformer action, where it becomes useful power output.

IV. Experimental Results ~

By carefully adjusting the frequency of the driving source in the circuit of Figure (1), it was possible to brightly light the LED device used as a load. The brightness was roughly equivalent to that seen when the LED was operated at a DC level of 1.85 volts and a current of 10 ma, or about 18.5 mW DC power level. It was only possible to light the LED directly by the signal source only very dimly at 100 KHz. Checked against a DC level, that brightness was found to be equivalent to 1.85 volts at 1 ma or about 1.85 mW of DC power! The real power being expended by the driving source was about 4.53 volts (AC rms) at 0.41 ma (rms) and thus the driving source was also in the order of 1.84 mW. Thus my digital meter here was fairly close in rms readings. It can only be concluded here that the MRA-type test performed here seems to indicate a real power gain of about 10 times!! This power is believed to be coming from the aether in a process somewhat as expressed here.

Similar type performance was also seen in a test circuit where the transformer coils were salvaged from a 120 V to 25 VAC transformer. The coils had about a 3/4" square opening into which I inserted two barium ferrite magnets which I obtained from Radio Shack as part # 64-1877.

V. Conclusions ~

While this was but a crude test using some materials which I had available, it does tend to support the claims of McClain and Wootan as reported in their MRA releases on the Internet. However, here I have tried to offer some other speculative insights into the nature of this circuit and the source of the additional energy 'seen' with this circuit. Perhaps some of you can help to develop this approach further and thus also help to establish the reality of the extraction of some of the vast latent energy present in all of space! Possibly, winding coils on the ferrite forms found in many AM radios (used as antennae) could be a good place to start? In any event, good luck with your tests.

References ~

(1) Contact: Rex Research, PO Box 19250, Jean, NV 89019 ~ www.rexresearch.com

(2) New Energy News 2(9): 5-6 (January 1995)

 


(2)    Cosmology Note (2-5-95)


Dear Colleague: This may be of interest to you.

I. Some Additional Notes Applying to the Cosmology Note of 1-30-95

A. The tube-type signal generator used in this test may be somewhat different than most recent solid-state units. Since this might be a factor in this test, a simplified schematic of the setup in the test of 1-30-95 is given:

Figure 1 ~


B. Since the tube-type generator was capable of less than 4 mW of sine wave power at 100 KHz, this test was necessarily low-level. The generator in this case was purely resistive and thus this may have been a factor in the operation of this particular MRA-type circuit.

II. Conclusion ~

As seen above, this is an extremely simple test, but yet it appears to show appreciable power gains. The secret to this MRA device may be determined here. It is believed to be an interaction of the fields from the capacitor and inductance with external scalar-type fields of high energy!

 


(3)    Cosmology Note (8-29-95)

I. More on the Mini-MRA ~

Here are some additional speculations on the operation of the MRA (and the Mini-MRA in particular) from the Rhysmonic Cosmology viewpoint. Shown in Figure (1) is a simplified and idealized depiction of the original Mini-MRA test. The sketch has been arranged so as to emphasize the possible 'interactions' between the MRA scalar fields and the earth's scalar gravity field. These interactions are believed to be the source of the 'extra power' seen with this device. For these 'space energy' interactions to be most effective, it is believed that the capacitor must be of the stacked layer type, and the inductor must be of the open 'flux circuit' type. To emphasize the interactions with the earth's gravity field, the sketch was arranged to show the possible orientations needed for maximum effect.

Figure 1:

The MRA is basically a series resonant circuit which is 'excited' by a low level sine wave signal generator of some sort. It is believed that the signal generator should be primarily resistive in nature for maximum performance. In essence, the MRA is a parametric or 'reactance' type of power amplifier. Each 'pole' or reactance is a source and a sink of scalar type field as indicated in Figure (1). It is speculated that the returning flux fields in each reactance will 'extract' some additional energy from the earth's g-field in a simple superposition of scalar fields, and thus sum their amplitudes. Using only a very small amount of energy from the local signal source (at resonance) the circuit will develop high reactive powers which will be 'exchanged' between the capacitor and inductor. For example, when energy is being stored in the capacitor electric scalar field, energy will be returning to the circuit from the inductor's scalar magnetic field, and vice versa. This is normally considered electronic theory. Rhysmonic theory, however, also infers that the returning flux to both the capacitor and the inductor will be 'augmented' at least two to four times (and even more in some special cases) in the scalar interaction with the earth's scalar field) or possible some other universe scalar fields?). This means that the reactive 'circulating' current in the series resonant circuit would also be at least two to four times the real current being drawn from the local generator source. Thus, the reactive powers could be increased by the current squared, or at least four to sixteen times! This has been verified in some of my past coil experiments. The reason for this is that, circuit-wise, the reactances of the capacitor and inductor are 180° out of phase and thus would 'cancel out', leaving only the residual resistance in the series circuit to determine the real current level. However, since each reactive voltage is 90° out of phase with the reactive current, the reactive powers are essentially non-dissipative (or lossless), assuming low loss components are used. Thus, the real powers, as a function of EI cos Ø, are essentially zero, but the reactive powers, as a function of EI sin Ø, are at their highest levels! The reactive powers continue to exist at resonance --- they are not cancelled out --- and the high reactive voltages can be measured across each reactance! The MRA makes use of the high reactive power developed across inductor L1 of Figure (1) available to a real load across L2 through the use of transformer action. Some of these reactions and other data are summarized also in Figure (1) for your convenience.

II. Some Additional Comments ~

(1) At resonance, in a properly working  Mini-MRA circuit, all waveforms are essentially sinusoidal and quite similar. Thus, most true RMS reading meters can be used to make relative power gain measurements, even somewhat outside of their normally calibrated ranges!

(2) At slightly off-resonance conditions, some additional waveforms may be seen superimposed upon the generator-induced waveforms. These were recognized by the writer as quite similar to those 'seen' with his gravity wave detector units, which are known to interact with cosmic induced 'modulations' on the earth's gravity field. While the gravity detectors generally have only one active pole, the presence of two active poles in the MRA can and does at times complicate these interactions. However, the effect seems to increase the parametric or reactive amplification --- thus the output powers here would be best determined with rectifications and thus as a DC power.

(3) In general, the real power developed in the resistive load across the secondary, L2, is a clean sinusoidal even under off-resonance conditions.

III. Some Final Remarks ~

The writer feels that the MRA is for real and a potential new energy source for mankind. It is free from pollution effects and uses a universal energy source which cannot be depleted!

It is also speculated that the 60 Hz energy source experiments using ferrites and coils (per Sweet) are possibly 'tapping' into the 50-60 Hz power grids which range over this earth. The long wavelengths of the 60 Hz transmission lines essentially generate scalar type fields which can 'excite' the universe (or possibly only the earth-ionosphere complex). However, this energy is normally returned to the power grids --- except for that which may be 'tapped' in this manner.

It may be hard to convince academia on all this, but you 'hands on' experimenters should be able to run these types of simple experiments and determine for yourself if this is real or not --- go for it!

Regards,

Greg Hodowanec



(4)    Cosmology Note (6-27-96)

I. Updated Tests on the Original Mini-MRA ~

A new breadboard of the original Mini-MRA was put together, using all new parts. The test circuit is shown in Figure (1). A 620 pF silver mica capacitor was used as C1, since the 680 pF was no longer available. Thus the resonance frequency was a bit higher. Previous testing had shown that if the current sensing resistor (RS) was placed between the two reactances of this series circuit, it was possible to directly measure the enhanced circulating current in the system. At resonance, the ordinary line current is generally determined by the DC resistance in the line since reactances are generally cancelled out. This does not mean that reactive voltages and currents are not present --- they are! Since the reactive voltages and currents are now 90° out-of-phase, there is no power dissipation. Both reactive voltages are reactive currents are 180° out-of-phase, thus they do not appear in the line RMS measurements, per se. However, the high reactance voltages can be measured across each reactance and the high reactive current is possible being measured across RS (in scope measurements).

The present circuit and test results are given in Figure (1) and Tables (1) and (2). The data is self-explanatory.

II. Conclusions ~

Tests of the original Mini-MRA continue to indicate that these results are real and there is better than 10X power gains in these circuits (depending upon operating conditions). It would be nice if those of you who have received the pulse transformer (or your equivalent) to try these tests. One caution: you must use reactive sources and loads!

Figure 1: Circuit Used ~
 


Table 1: Philips Model PM 3214 Scope ~

Scope Tests:

VG = 4V (pk-pk) ~ 2.8 V (rms)

IG = VG /RG~ 2.8 / 5 x 103 ~ 0.56 mW (rms)
Pin~ 2.8 c 0.56 ~ 1.57 mW (rms)
Vout = 5.8 V (pk-pk) ~ 4.1 V (rms)
iout = Vout / RL ~ 4/1 / 4.1 ~ 16.8 mW (rms)
Pout ~ 4.1 x 4.1 ~ 16.8 mW (rms)
P.G. = Pout / Pin ~ 16.8 / 1.57 ~ 10.7 X
Also:

VC1 = 28 V (pk-pk) ~ 19.8 V (rms)

VL1 = 30 V (pk=pk) ~ 21.2 V (rms)
icirc = VRS / RS ~ 27 mV (pk-pk) / 3.3 Ohms ~ 19.1 mV (rms) / 3.3 ~ 5.8 mA (rms)
icirc /iG ~ 5.8 / .056 ~ 10.4 X (Same order as P.G.!)
Note: All waveforms are good sinusoidals!
Table 2: RMS Digital Voltmeter Tests ~

Parameter    Fluke 87        Micronta 22-198U        Micronta 22-191

VG                  1.6 V            1.61 V                          1.35 V

iG                     0.32 mA        0.32 mA                       0.27 mA
Pin                  0.52 mW        0.52 mW                     0.36 mW
iline                 0.32 mA        < 0.5 mA                     < 0.5 mA
Rsense          1.5 Ohm         1 Ohm                          1 Ohm
Vout              2.3 V              2.3 V                            1.93 V
iout                2.3 mA            2.3 mA                         1.93 mA
Pout              5.3 mW           5.3 mW                        3.7 mW
P.G.           10.2 X             10.2 X                         10.3 X
Note: VG is 'tuned' by fo for minimum.

Remarks ~

(1) iG = VG /RG = VG / 5 x 103

(2) iline is read at point X using the mA range of the DVM (with Rsense as shown)

(3) RL was made 1 Kohm to enable an iout reading directly related to Vout.

(4) While the Fluke 87 and Micronta 22-198U meters read rather closely, the Micronta 220191 reads somewhat lower. However, all power gains (P.G.) are close. This again confirms that power gains determined using most DVMs outside of their calibrated ranges probably are valid provided that resistive sources and loads are used with good sinusoidal waveforms.

 


(5)    Cosmology Note (6-27-96)

Dear Colleague: This may be of interest to you.

I. Some Recent Updated Tests of the Original Mini-MRA ~

A fresh breadboard was assembled for these tests as shown in Figure (1). One change is that the circulating current sensing resistor RS was placed between the two reactances. Since strong scalar-type fields are believed to be generated by this circuitry, this position could be more balanced. At resonance, the generator line current would normally be determined by the remaining resistance in the line, since the line reactances are essentially cancelled out. This does not means that the reactive voltages and currents are not present --- they are! However, since the reactive voltages and currents are 90° out-of-phase, there is essentially no power losses (dissipation) in this line. Moreover, the reactive currents in a series circuit are in-phase and thus should appear as the circulatory current in the line. This could be directly measured by the sampling resistance RS, or also calculated from the measured voltage across, say resistance Li; e.g.,

Icirc = VL1 / XL1 = VL1 / 2?fL1 ~ 21.2 / 2545 ~ 8.3 mA

For the test of Table (1). The icirc as determined by the sampling resistor RS was about 5.8 mA as given in Table (1). The difference seen here might be due to the sensitivity of the scope probe to other scalar components present here. With a calculated line current (iG) of about 0.56 mA, it is seen that the circulating line current is more than 10X the generator current. Where does this excess current come from? It is my belief that the scalar-type flux being generated by the capacitance and inductor of this circuit may be 'interacting' with the aether (or some other aether-related fields) and thus, in effect, 'extracting' this additional flux energy. The generator is a source of the voltage (potential) to drive this series circuit, and thus the 'drive power' would be determined by the power dissipated in the generator resistive source impedance of about 5 KOhms, i.e., Pin = VG x iG. Again, remember that there are no real losses in the series circuit line due to the 90° phase difference between the reactive terms. However, the reactive power (or VAR) exists and it is of high magnitude. In this simple circuit, the high reactive voltage (potential) developed in L1 is transformed (and stepped down) in the secondary winding, L2. This stepped down voltage will now drive a real current in the 1 KOhm load resistance, RL, and thus real power is developed at the output. The use of resistive sources and loads in this circuitry will enable the calculation of true RMS powers since the voltages and currents are in-phase under such conditions.

II. Conclusions ~

The tests as given here continue to indicate real power gains for the Mini-MRA, even with calibrated oscilloscope tests. The use of digital-type meters (outside of their calibrated ranges in these tests) will not measure true RMS voltages and currents, but the power gains determined could be valid provided the waveforms are truly sinusoidal. Thus, these types of tests could be made by researchers with limited equipment and means. However, it must be emphasized that if phase-shift complications are to be avoided, the source and load must be resistive and the waveforms sinusoidal.

Finally, while the enclosed tests are believed to be valid, only more independent testing (possibly using other components) will really settle the issue of over-unity operation for MA-type devices. In the long run a 'stand-alone' operation will make any measurement questions moot! While my efforts are still quite limited, I will continue with that quest as time permits.

Meanwhile, good experimenting to all!

Greg Hodowanec
 

(6)    Cosmology Note (7-22-96)

Dear Colleague: This may be of interest to you.

I. Some More Speculations on the Mini-MRA ~

Even though I was only able to apply very limited effort on the Mini-MRA device, I have released to you many thoughts and experiments, some of which could be quite significant for an understanding of the operation of this device. The viewpoints are from Rhysmonic Cosmology and those of you who are quite familiar with some of its premises should be able to understand the following discussions:

Figure 1:

A. Simplified Sketch of the Mini-MRA ~

Shown above is a very simple depiction of the peak one-half cycle of the 'flow' of scalar flux in the Mini-MRA. In normal theory, one considers that when energy is being 'stored' in the capacitor's 'field', energy is being 'returned' from the inductor's 'field'. Rhysmonic Theory goes well beyond that simple statement and speculates that the capacitor 'flux' is 'exciting' the universe (or some component of it) and that the inductor 'flux' is also 'exciting' the universe. That this is so has been reported to you in many simple experiments and some Notes and papers in the past. However, as depicted above, these two flux components are 180° out-of-phase and also a function of the resonant frequency. It is also emphasized that good sinusoidal waveforms and resistive loads are necessary for this circuit to work!

B. Further Remarks on This Operation ~

(1) While the intrinsic rhysmonic flux of the universe s 'instantaneous' and 'omni-directional', there are also many other 'directed' fluxes due to various universe and terrestrial factors. A few common terrestrial factors are the earth's G-field, E-field, magnetic field, as well as the many components in the ionosphere and near-earth, due to emissions from the sun, and possible other cosmic emissions. Thus, the universe is a vast source of energy, both intrinsic and also 'converted'. The converted energies are presently being utilized, much of it being rapidly exhausted and much of it polluting the earth.

(2) The scalar-type 'flux' being developed by the reactances through the action of the driving source, i.e., the generator, will be as shown by the solid lines in the depiction above, while the interactions possible in the universe will be simply depicted by the dotted lines while the orientation of the reactances possibly could be directed for enhanced interactions (say, with the earth's G- or E-fields), the positioning, in general, will be immaterial, since there always will be a substantial component of rhysmonic flux in any direction. The 'driven' reactances will 'pump' the universe (or some component of it). Many past rhysmonic experiments have shown this to be the case and such 'pumping' was found to 'magnify' the energy levels in possible 'resonance' in these interactions. The higher the drive level of the 'pump', i.e., the drive, the higher the level of interactions. Also, the longer the 'pump' acts, the greater the level of interaction up to some limiting level. This has also been proven in other simple rhysmonic experiments, many of which have been released in the past, and some of which were not! Since most of these experiments are so simple, one only needs to perform them (which I find many are reluctant to do so since they are so unconventional!).

(3) Due to the nature of some of the 'directed' rhysmonic fluxes, the performance of the Mini-MRA could vary with the rotation of the earth, i.e., the time of day; but in general, the interaction is found to be relatively constant. The interaction is essentially between parallel scalar-field components and thus one of simple superposition of fields (potential) and thus only simple algebraic addition of flux is required. While certain 'resonant' frequencies could enhance the interaction with certain directed flux components, the long time constant of these circuits compared to the very high basic rhysmonic (intrinsic) frequencies will ensure at least a measure of interaction at all the frequencies of operation (provided resonance occurs).

(4) The flux interaction in the universe (depicted by the dotted lines in the sketch) is repetitive at the resonant frequency and thus should also complete the reactive circuit (perhaps no line return may be needed?). Therefore, the sensing resistor, RS, could directly determine this reactive 'circulating' current. With the proper design of the reactive elements and a proper frequency of operation, this reactive current could be made many, many times greater than the generator line current needed to sustain this mode of operation. The reactive voltage across L1 would be icirc x XL1, and could be vary large. However, due to the 90° phase difference between the reactive voltages and reactive currents, no appreciable dissipation losses will be sustained in this reactive 'circulating loop'. The high reactive voltage in L1 can be transformer-coupled to L2, where this high voltage could now drive a large real current (in phase with the voltage) and thus develop large real power in the load, RL. This has been confirmed in many Mini-MRA tests, but again I must caution you that solid state sources can react to the scalar fluxes being developed here and thus distort the drive input and even destroy the source!

II. Conclusions ~

As usual, the above speculative remarks on the possible operation of the Mini-MRA are primarily aimed at getting more of you more actively involved in these simple tests. All indications are that the MRA is for real and possibly a great new source of space energy which will be both inexhaustible and also non-polluting. While these exploratory tests are yet at low levels, there is every reason to believe that very high levels will be achieved with this technique. Witness the Swiss M-L, which to me appears to be but a Super MRA device!

Rhysmonic Cosmology is basically used in these discussions --- it is a real science --- and many experiments have shown it to be so. Much has been released to you in past Notes and papers, both published and unpublished. Also, there is much that has not yet been released --- to use the Swiss M-L group's phrase, "Mankind may not be ready for it yet". In any case, I wish you all well and continued good experimenting.

My best regards,

Greg Hodowanec



(7)    Cosmology Note (6-23-01)

Dear Colleague: This may be of interest to you.

I. Mini-MRA Circuit #FE-6B Revisited as Ckt. FE-6C

A. Background ~

This circuit was featured in the July-September 1995 issue of Extraordinary Science Magazine. The circuit was originally intended as a Demo Unit. It was sent to McClain and Wootan, who modified it somewhat to limit performance range and then had it sent to three independent labs in the Georgia area for evaluation. All three labs confirmed power gains in the order of 10-21 times! It was eventually returned to me and I verified their data. I have now restored the original circuitry and made some tests using a 25 MHz scope rather than digital voltmeters.

B. The Restored FE-6C Circuit ~

Figure (1) ~ Notes: Input LED was eliminated. Output LED was made switchable. Input waveforms were distorted due to the proximity of MRA scalar fields. Output waveform: good sinewaves. Pout~ saturation?

C. Initial Test Results ~

VG~ 6 V (pk-pk) ~ 4.2 V (rms)

iG ~ VG / RG~ 4.2 / 10K ~ 0.42 mA (rms)
Real Pin ~ VG x iG ~ 4.2 x 4.2 ~ 1.8 mW (rms)
Vout ~ 10V (pk-pk) ~ 7.1V (rms)
Iout~ Vout / RL ~ 7.1 / 1K ~ 7.1 mA (rms)
Real Pout ~ Vout x iout ~ 7.1 x 7.1 ~ 50.4 mW (rms)
P.G. ~ Pout / Pin~ 50.4 / 1.8 ~ 28x ~ loaded circuit Q!

II. Conclusions ~

(1) Circuit FE-6C, except for some distortion in input waveform appears to yet work well (Will try to improve the waveform).

(2) Output LED (18 mW unit) is used only to set fo for maximum Pout.



(8)    Cosmology Note (6-30-01)


I. The Mini-MRA Revisited ~

A. Background ~

In the past I have reported to you on many Mini-MRA (Magnetic Resonance Amplifier) tests which were instilled by the initial report by McClain and Wootan on this device published in the January 1995 issue of New Energy News. At that time I had tried a 'first look' at this circuit using some parts and equipment which I had on hand. This initial circuit has since proved to be very useful in trying to understand the operation of the MRA device (from the viewpoint of my Rhysmonic Cosmology). This Note will summarize my viewpoints from a position of hindsight at this time.

B. The Series Resonant Mini-MRA Circuit ~

This was out 'initial' look at this device but I will now summarize it anew. A simplified version of the circuit is shown below. A new unit was made on 6-23-01 and evaluated at that time. Tests were made with a 25 MHz scope and all waveforms were very good sinewaves. The signal source used was an old tube-type which was capable of only about 10 mW if output power Imax).

Figure 1:

T1: 5 mH Red Pulse Xformer (5:1 ratio)

RG: 2.5 K
RL: 1 K
C1: 680 of mica capacitor
RA: 3.33 Ohms
Fo: 74.2 KHz (measured)
VC1~ VL1~ 14.1 V (rms)
VG~ 1.7 V (rms)
IC~ iG~ VG / RG ~ 1.7 / 2.5 K ~ 0.68 mA (rms)
Real Pin ~ VG x iG ~ 1.7 x 0.68 ~ 1.16 mW (rms)
Vout~ 3.1 V (rms)
Iout~ Vout / RL ~ 3.1 1K ~ 3.1 mA (rms)
Real Pout ~ Vout x iout ~ 3.12 ~ 9.6 mW
Reactive Power L1 = VAR ~ VL1 x iC ~ 14.1 x 0.68 ~ 9.6 mW also.
P.G ~ Pout / Pin~ 9.6 / 1.16 ~ 8.3 X
Also, P.G. = Voltage Gain ~ VL1 / VG ~ 141.1 / 1.7 ~ 8.3 X ~ loaded Q!

B. Equivalent Parallel Resonant Circuit ~

The equivalent parallel resonant circuit should confirm the operation of the series version of C1, L1, and the loaded Q's remain equal. The simplified circuit is shown:

Figure 2:


All circuit values remain same as in series except for Rp, XL1, and VRS.

FO = 74.2 KHz

XL1~ 2? fO L1 ~ 2330 Ohms
VRS~ 18.8 mV (rms)
VG~ VRP~ VC1 ~ VL1~ 1.7 V (rms)
RP~ transformed (r) ~ XL12 / r ~ (2330)2 / 9.3 ~ 0.6 MOhm
Iline~ VG / RP ~ 1.7 / 0.6M ~ 2.8 uA (neglect!)
IG~ VG /RG ~ 1.7 / 2.5 R ~ 0.68 mA (rms); iC ~ VRS / RS ~ 18.8 / 3.33 ~ 5.65 mA (rms)
Real Pin ~ VG x iG ~ 1.7 x 0.68 ~ 1.16 mW (rms)
Real Pout ~ Vout x iout ~ 3.12 ~ 9.6 mW (rms)
Reactive Power L1 = VAR ~ VL1 x iC ~ 1.7 x 5.65 ~ 9.6 mW also.
Power Gain ~ Vout / Pin ~ 9.6 / 1.16 ~ 8.3X
Also: P.G. = current gain ~ 1C / iG ~ 5.65 / 0.68 ~ 8.3X ~ loaded Q!

II. Conclusions ~

(1) The loaded Q in the parallel equivalent circuit is equal to the loaded Q in the series resonant circuit!

(2) The loaded Q's are also approximately equal to Power Gains (P.G.)!

(3) The reactive L1 powers (VAR) in both modes are equal!

(4) Note also that fo (74.2 KHz) is also a subharmonic of the Universal Rhysmonic (Planck) frequency 1.885 x 10-43 Hz.

(5) Tube-type generators are recommended for these tests as they are not sensitive to scalar fields as solid state sources seem to be!

(6) It is concluded that the MRA type devices (or more simple reactive systems) remain viable as a source of energy extracted from the Universal G-fields (i.e., aether). However, more effort by others is needed --- I have shown you the way and the many possibilities. Good Luck!

Greg Hodowanec

 



MRAFLUKE.ASC
14 Nov 1995
To: keelynet@ix.netcom.com
From: David Forbes
Subject: MRA 

I found the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier to be an amusing if not wholly effective Free Energy device. I showed the articles to my co-workers one at a time, and the first thing each of them said was, 'You can't measure AC power with a Fluke meter!'

I built Greg Hodowanec's Mini-MRA circuit (described in Jul-Aug-Sep '95 Extraordinary Science magazine) and found that it works at about 50%
efficiency if the input current is measured with an oscilloscope. Then I saw that his measured input current was much lower than mine. I found that he used a Fluke 87 DMM to measure the input current but not the output current. He calculated output current from the load resistor, so his output current value was more or less correct.

I then called Fluke to ask about the frequency response of the AC current function of the model 87, and they said it's only accurate up to 2 KiloHertz. He was using it at 75 KHz! No wonder he measured such an efficient circuit... he was badly misusing the test equipment. And he was measunring in such a way that the bad reading increased the apparent efficiency.

The reason I built this circuit is that it is a textbook circuit that exists in millions of consumer electronic items with <100% efficiency. So I knew it
was a bogus Free Energy device before I built it. I just built it to demonstrate to myself that I understood the author's error. Just in case you haven't realized this yet:

The file you got from Joel McClain about the Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical 'verification' is NOT a verification of over-unity operation of his MRA. It is simply a duplication of McClain's erroneous efficiency measurement. Note the wording of the following statements by TRA:

4)  The input current was then calculated PER THE CUSTOMER as the voltage (rms) across R1 & R2 divided by the resistance of R1 + R2.

6)  The output current through R3 was calculated PER THE CUSTOMER  as the voltage (rms) across R3 divided by the resistance of R3.

7)  The CUSTOMER DEFINES the MRA gain as the output voltage (rms) D to E times the output current through R3 divided by the input voltage (rms) A to B times the input current through R1 & R2.

The people at TRA did *not* analyze the circuit or the measurement techniques. They simply used McClain's techniques, as they stated above.  That doesn't prove that the circuit works. It only serves to lend false authority to a flawed measurement --- one that was shown to be erroneous by both Puthoff and Frode.

So please change your MRA score to: 2 against, 1 irrelevant.

One thing to keep in mind about the MRA. The underlying principle of the whole thing as stated by Norm Wooten is that it taps the energy locked in a permanent magnet and an piezoelectric crystal. (I don't have the source handy, but he says this in his Extraordinary Science article of Jul-Aug-Sep '95.)

I don't know if you're familiar with the operation of a peizoelectric crystal, but it doesn't have any energy locked in it. It just has the ability to convert electrical energy into mechanical energy.  That is, if you put in electrical power, you get out mechanical power, or vice-versa.  Nothing magic in that. An electromagnet does the same thing. And they have both been shown to do this with less than 100% efficiency by thousands of researchers over the years.